What would be a consequence of mapping without considering data sensitivity?

Mapping without considering data sensitivity can lead to potential privacy violations, which is a significant concern in the field of geospatial intelligence. When sensitive information, such as personal data or critical infrastructure locations, is mapped without proper controls or safeguards, it can expose individuals or entities to various risks. This exposure could result in unauthorized access to private information, facilitate criminal activities, or undermine national security.

Additionally, improper handling of sensitive data may violate legal and ethical standards, leading to repercussions for organizations. It's crucial for geospatial intelligence professionals to be aware of the sensitivity of the information they handle and to implement appropriate measures to protect it. This includes following regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) for health data or the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) for government-related data.

In contrast, while inaccurate data representation and increased public interest may arise from other factors in the mapping process, they do not directly address the implications of overlooking data sensitivity. Improved data accuracy is unlikely to be a consequence of failing to consider sensitivity, as it could lead to the opposite effect if sensitive data is revealed without care.